Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process

ietf

2013-05-01 12:11:38

On 5/1/13 10:39 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:

On May 1, 2013, at 18:33, Michael Richardson 
<mcr+ietf(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca>
wrote:

we need to create a new category of document which amounts to
"fully baked ID"


Yes.  (I'm not sure it's a category, it might just be a stage.)


Isn't that Proposed Standard?

Peter

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Jari Arkko Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Michael Richardson Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Carsten Bormann Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Peter Saint-Andre <= Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Paul Hoffman Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Peter Saint-Andre Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Eggert, Lars Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Carsten Bormann Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Benoit Claise Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Hannes Tschofenig referencing RFCs (Was: Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process), Jari Arkko Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Olaf Kolkman Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, John C Klensin Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Martin Rex

Previous by Date:	Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Carsten Bormann
Next by Date:	Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Paul Hoffman
Previous by Thread:	Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Carsten Bormann
Next by Thread:	Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Paul Hoffman
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]