ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process

2013-05-02 00:22:28
On May 1, 2013, at 19:35, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter(_at_)stpeter(_dot_)im> 
wrote:
Sorry: oughtn't that be Proposed Standard?

Yep, it ought to.

Crazy idea: Call a draft PS when it completes WG last-call and give it an RFC 
number, call it something else when it passes IESG review (draft standard? :-) 
and republish the RFC. When there is interop experience, call it full standard 
and republish as needed.

Yeah, all kinds of issues, but if we created a new thing here in between WGLC 
and PS, the broader industry would never understand.

Lars