Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE

ietf

Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE

2013-05-03 12:55:11

On Jueves, 2 de mayo de 2013 15:53:09 Eliot Lear wrote:

3.  What can be done by the IETF to improve likelihood of adoption, and
conversely what should we not bang our heads against?


Amend the Wikipedia article about SPF, where it states that it is TXT only?

-------------------------
A: Because it breaks the logical flow of discussion.
Q: Why is top posting bad?

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Murray S. Kucherawy Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Eliot Lear Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Noel David Torres Taño <= Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Hector Santos Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Alessandro Vesely Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Alessandro Vesely Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Alessandro Vesely Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Alessandro Vesely Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Måns Nilsson A note about draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis (was: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE), S Moonesamy Re: A note about draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis, Doug Barton Re: A note about draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis, Andrew Sullivan Re: A note about draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis, Doug Barton

Previous by Date:	Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Ralph Droms
Next by Date:	Re: Language editing, Dale R. Worley
Previous by Thread:	Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Eliot Lear
Next by Thread:	Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Hector Santos
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]