Not related to the draft as such (whose publication, incidentally, I
support):
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:23:03PM +0700, Randy Bush wrote:
1 - intro - do we have a standard way to refer to the dns specs as tuned
in 42 subsequent rfcs since 1035?
Alas, no. Some time ago, DNSEXT was re-vivified in an effort to write
a "protocol profile" that would have been a nice roll-up document to
do this. But there was no energy to get the work done and the drafts
languished for months without any changes. It still seems a
worthwhile project, but there is no evidence that we have a population
interested enough to do the work.
Best,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs(_at_)anvilwalrusden(_dot_)com