The first part of Section 2.1 should have a sentence added like "An
RRTYPE code has been assigned so 48-bit MAC addresses can be stored
using the DNS protocol." with an appropriate reference. A similar
sentence for 64-bit MAC addresses should be added to the first part of
Section 2.2.
The lists of Ethertypes in Appendix B should be brought up to date.
Thanks,
Donald
=============================
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
d3e3e3(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:07 AM, The IESG <iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'IANA Considerations and IETF Protocol and Documentation Usage for IEEE
802 Parameters'
<draft-eastlake-rfc5342bis-02.txt> as Best Current Practice
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2013-06-04. Exceptionally, comments
may be
sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
Some IETF protocols make use of Ethernet frame formats and IEEE 802
parameters. This document discusses some use of such parameters in
IETF protocols, specifies IANA considerations for assignment of
points under the IANA OUI (Organizationally Unique Identifier),
provides some values for use in documentation, and obsoletes RFC
5342.
The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eastlake-rfc5342bis/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eastlake-rfc5342bis/ballot/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.