John C Klensin <john dash ietf at jck dot com> wrote:
I think it is all very well to ask for affiliations in principle
and, also in principle, I agree that it is a good idea. But, in
practice, I think there are a lot of clarifications and other
changes that would be required and that might or might not be
practical.
I used the term "Consultant" in RFCs 4645 and 5645, instead of revealing
the name of my company (which was different each time, and neither of
which contributed any time or money to my WG effort). I did this because
the WG at the time included a malicious contributor who had already
contacted the HR department of another contributor's employer, asking
them to professionally discipline the employee, because he had supported
an RFC 3683 PR-action against the first contributor. Full disclosure can
be a dangerous thing.
--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, USA
http://ewellic.org | @DougEwell