On May 28, 2013, at 11:25 AM, Richard Barnes <rlb(_at_)ipv(_dot_)sx> wrote:
I would suggest we not try to sort out on this list which sorts of Internet
services are subject to American regulations.
Or those of any other jurisdiction. If jurisdiction Z comes to the IETF and
says "we have declared protocol A to be a service of type B", and we can think
of harmless ways of making B more obvious in an extended version of A, that
seems like potential work, possibly even for a WG but certainly for individual
submission. But it should be done after A is done (assuming that A is
extensible) and after Z has looked at A.
--Paul Hoffman