Re: Gen-art telechat review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-06.txt (upda

On 5/10/2013 8:12 AM, Robert Sparks wrote:
> Thanks Bing -
>
> The updates make the document better, and I appreciate the resolution of
> referencing Tim's expired draft.
So the solution is to not reference it? I see the name of the draft is
mentioned in the acknowledgments as:
 [draft-chown-v6ops-renumber-thinkabout].

Shouldn't it then be an informational reference? It doesn't make sense
to me to mention a draft in the text and not have a reference.

Stig