On 05/21/2013 11:57 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
On 2013-05-21, at 11:56, Keith Moore <moore(_at_)network-heretics(_dot_)com>
wrote:
2119 language is intended to describe requirements of standards-track
documents. Informational documents cannot impose requirements.
Then I think we've just identified a reason why this document should be on the
standards track.
Actually I think that what we need is a BCP that says that DNS is not
intended, not designed, and SHOULD NOT be used for dissemination of any
information that is not deemed acceptable for widespread public
distribution. Neither the DNS protocol nor DNS implementations are
designed to meet the security requirements of such applications, and DNS
is too widely deployed to change that.
Keith