On 05/21/2013 11:52 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
On 2013-05-21, at 11:50, Keith Moore <moore(_at_)network-heretics(_dot_)com>
wrote:
On 05/21/2013 11:46 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
With respect to the question of proposed standard. What changes if the
requested status is informational?
I think just get rid of the normative language - SHOULDs, MUSTs, etc.
From the perspective of giving guidance to people implementing these RRTypes,
it seems to me that the normative language is useful, perhaps even necessary,
to ensure interoperability.
I admit I have not done my homework here; is the suggestion that the 2119
normative language cannot (MUST NOT? :-) appear in an informational document?
2119 language is intended to describe requirements of standards-track
documents. Informational documents cannot impose requirements.
Keith