On 05/21/2013 01:35 PM, joel jaeggli wrote:
On 5/21/13 9:02 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
On 05/21/2013 11:57 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
On 2013-05-21, at 11:56, Keith Moore <moore(_at_)network-heretics(_dot_)com>
wrote:
2119 language is intended to describe requirements of
standards-track documents. Informational documents cannot impose
requirements.
Then I think we've just identified a reason why this document should
be on the standards track.
Actually I think that what we need is a BCP that says that DNS is not
intended, not designed, and SHOULD NOT be used for dissemination of
any information that is not deemed acceptable for widespread public
distribution.
The basically rules out every internal split horizon use of DNS in
existence.
Indeed. Things have gotten way too far out of hand. Again, DNS was not
engineered for this purpose, and the hacks that people have employed
like split-horizon DNS do not and cannot fix the underlying problems.
Keith