On May 15, 2013, at 12:36 PM, Joe Touch <touch(_at_)isi(_dot_)edu> wrote:
I'm impressed that you have such a specific interpretation that this
criteria refers to the entire document, even when it talks about the
"feature of a protocol".
"The motivation for a feature of a protocol is not clear enough." What's
ambiguous or subject to interpretation about that? The commentary exactly
echoes what I said. This does not mean that all lacks of clarity are not
DISCUSS criteria: only that a lack of clarity with respect to motivation is not.