-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 5/29/13 11:38 AM, Melinda Shore wrote:
I think this is one of the best discussions of what we're about
that I've seen anywhere, and I'm grateful to John for working this
through.
One thing I'd like to take up further is this:
On 5/29/13 9:23 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
Similarly, we sometimes hear it argued that we should accept a
specification for Proposed Standard unchanged because it has been
extensively developed and reviewed elsewhere. That may be
reasonable in some cases although I'd hope we wouldn't make it a
common practice. But, if a specification adopted for Proposed
Standard on that basis is then proposed for advancement to
Internet Standard, I think the review should be comprehensive
--perhaps even more comprehensive than the usual such review--
because the Internet Standard is unambiguously an IETF product
and recommendation not that of the other body.
I'd actually much prefer to see these go to informational, if
they're to be published. Otherwise I agree - if something's going
to be an IETF standard it needs to go through the IETF standards
development review and revision process, which is probably not what
the authors want.
/me wonders if we need a separate series for informational documentation
Peter
- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=sjcp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----