At 04:07 07-05-2013, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'IANA Considerations and IETF Protocol and Documentation Usage for IEEE
802 Parameters'
<draft-eastlake-rfc5342bis-02.txt> as Best Current Practice
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2013-06-04. Exceptionally, comments
may be
Sorry for the late comments. I'll defer to the authors on what to do
about them.
In Section 2.1.3:
"o must be for standards purposes (either for an IETF Standard or
other standard related to IETF work),"
The above is not that clear. I suggest using "IETF Review". BTW,
the documentation requirement could also be fulfilled with
"Specification Required".
Section 2.3.2.1 mentions changes to RFC 2153. I suggest having an
"Updates:" for that RFC.
In Section 3.1:
"o the assignment must be for standards use (either for an IETF
Standard or other standard related to IETF work),"
IETF Review (see previous comment about that) could be used.
In Section 4:
"If different policies from those above are required for such a
parameter, a BCP or Standards Track RFC must be adopted updating this
BCP and specifying the new policy and parameter."
"Standards Action" could be used for this.
In Section 5.1 I suggest using "IESG Approval". BTW, IESG
Ratification of an Expert Review approval recommendation looks unusual to me.
Regards,
-sm