"IAB" == IAB Chair <iab-chair(_at_)iab(_dot_)org> writes:
IAB> The Liaison statement can be found here:
IAB> https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1258/
IAB> The Internet Society will forward this liaison statement to
IAB> ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 on their letterhead. This will carry more
IAB> weight than a statement just from the IESG and IAB because the
IAB> Internet Society holds a Class A liaison with SC6 on behalf of
IAB> the IETF.
Thanks for this heads up.
The ASCII art diagrams in the PDF at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/liaison-2013-06-06-the-iesg-and-the-iab-isoiec-jtc1-sc6-liaison-from-the-isoc-to-isoiec-jtc1sc6-and-its-national-body-members-in-relation-to-iso-iecjtc1-sc6_n15618-attachment-1.pdf
are regretably formatted with non-constant size spaces, so the diagrams
are perhaps much less useful than they could be. Perhaps this document
could also be made available in .txt format?
IAB> The TISec proponents have indicated that they believe that
IAB> TISec is different than IPsec. This liaison is a response this
IAB> statement. It points out how IPsec supports the same
IAB> functionality, and it encourages
IAB> the TISec proponents to engage in the IETF process to specify
IAB> the use of their national algorithms in IPsec, as has been done
IAB> for other national algorithms.
I concur strongly with the IAB view, thank you for this.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] mcr(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on
rails [
pgpjIMOx_Ue6o.pgp
Description: PGP signature