ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [IETF] Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC)

2013-06-19 16:15:24

On Jun 19, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Brian E Carpenter 
<brian(_dot_)e(_dot_)carpenter(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:

On 19/06/2013 18:25, Patrik Fältström wrote:
On 18 jun 2013, at 18:54, Jari Arkko <jari(_dot_)arkko(_at_)piuha(_dot_)net> 
wrote:

As for the rest of the discussion - I'm sure there are things to be 
improved in ICANN. I'd suggest though that some of the feedback might be 
better placed in an ICANN discussion than on IETF list. And is not like 
there'd be nothing to improve on our side :-) Lets focus on IETF aspects 
here.

I think this is the correct strategy, BUT, I see as a very active 
participant in ICANN (chair of SSAC) that work in ICANN could be easier if 
some "more" technical standards where developed in IETF, 


+ lots.

If these are not developed in the IETF, we run the risk of ICANN doing 
technical stuff.

As someone whose time is now[0] split between ICANN and IETF, I can tell you 
something -- you[1] *really* don't want ICANN developing technical standard.

A pre-condition for that is that technical and operational problem statements
are formulated, which could be sent to appropriate WGs or used to justify
a BOF. If ICANN could focus on that instead of solutionism or committeeism,
progress should be possible.

Yup. This message needs to be properly communicated though -- Suzanne Woolf has 
been attempting (and being fairly effective) to do so.

W
[0]: I, along with some other IETF folk, serve on the SSAC under Patrik. 
[1]: You in the general sense, not you as in Brian or Patrik -- although I'm 
guessing you don't either. Are you confused yet with which you you are?


   Brian

and moved forward along standards track, that ICANN can reference. Same with 
some epp-related issues, and also DNS-related, which I must admit I think 
has stalled in the IETF. When that happens, ICANN start to "invent" or at 
least discuss IETF related issues -- which I think is non optimal. But on 
the other hand, if IETF do not move forward, then what should ICANN do?

I will btw be the first few days (until including Tuesday or so) at IETF in 
Berlin and am happy to discuss this issue with anyone interested.

  Patrik Fältström
  Chair SSAC, ICANN

.



--
She'd even given herself a middle initial - X - which stood for "someone who 
has a cool and exciting middle name".

    -- (Terry Pratchett, Maskerade)



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>