On Jul 29, 2013, at 5:35 AM, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf(_at_)mit(_dot_)edu>
wrote:
I like your text below except that signing is the wrong word.
How about generation of integrity-protected messages?
Yeah, that's what I meant.. New text WFM, thanks [again] Sam for addressing
these concerns!
-danny
These messages are almost never digitally signed.
Proposed text:
Routers need to
have tight enough time synchronization that receivers permit a key
to be utilized for validation prior to the first use of that key for
signing or
availability will be impacted.