Re: [karp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-karp-ops-model-07.txt> (Operations Mod

Danny sent me private text that he believes is better than what I
proposed.


I like your text below except that signing is the wrong word.
How about generation of integrity-protected messages?

These messages are almost never digitally signed.

Proposed text:

> Routers need to
>      have tight enough time synchronization that receivers permit a key
>      to be utilized for validation prior to the first use of that key for 
> signing or
>      availability will be impacted.