Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Repres

ietf

Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard

2013-07-29 05:07:01

On 7/29/13 4:54 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

The question I want an answer to is whether this is going to be the only
standard for a binary version of JSON allowed.


That is certainly not what I heard during the APPSAWG session this
morning: the intent is that this be one format among many.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Zach Shelby Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Mcgregor Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Peter Saint-Andre <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [karp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-karp-ops-model-07.txt> (Operations Model for Router Keying) to Informational RFC, Sam Hartman
Next by Date:	Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials, SM
Previous by Thread:	Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Next by Thread:	Re: [karp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-karp-ops-model-07.txt> (Operations Model for Router Keying) to Informational RFC, Sam Hartman
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]