* The charter disallows major protocol changes -- removing the SPF RR type
is a direct charter violation; since SPF is being used on the Internet. ...
Uh huh.
$ dig besserwisser.org txt
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;besserwisser.org. IN TXT
;; ANSWER SECTION:
besserwisser.org. 86173 IN TXT "MN-1334-RIPE"
besserwisser.org. 86173 IN TXT "v=spf0x44 be allowed to
contaminate the DNS."
besserwisser.org. 86173 IN TXT "v=spf0x42 besides, SPF as
concept is a layering violation."
besserwisser.org. 86173 IN TXT "v=spf0x41 not valid. because
SPF records belong in RRtype 99."
besserwisser.org. 86173 IN TXT "v=spf0x43 adding insult to
injury, this layering violation MUST not "
$ dig besserwisser.org spf
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;besserwisser.org. IN SPF
;; ANSWER SECTION:
besserwisser.org. 86140 IN SPF "v=spf1 ip6:0::/0 -all"
besserwisser.org. 86140 IN SPF "v=spf1 ip4:0.0.0.0/0 -all"
R's,
John