IETF Discussion (date)
August 31, 2013
- Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis, William McCall, 23:42
- Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis, S Moonesamy, 22:33
- Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis, Hector Santos, 16:52
- Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt), Masataka Ohta, 16:16
- Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis, S Moonesamy, 15:30
- Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis, Scott Brim, 13:58
- Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis, Dave Crocker, 13:17
- Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis, Phill, 13:16
- draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis, Melinda Shore, 13:03
- Re: [IAB] Call for Volunteers to Serve on the ICANN Nominating Committee, Russ Housley, 11:54
- Re: Call for Volunteers to Serve on the ICANN Nominating Committee, Patrik Fältström, 11:51
- Re: Call for Volunteers to Serve on the ICANN Nominating Committee, IAB Chair, 11:36
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08, Murray S. Kucherawy, 09:40
- Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt), John C Klensin, 08:28
- Re: Is the datatracker authoritative (was: WG Review: Dynamic Host Configuration (dhc)), Ted Lemon, 08:06
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08, Roni Even, 06:30
- Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt), manning bill, 04:53
- Re: Is the datatracker authoritative (was: WG Review: Dynamic Host Configuration (dhc)), Jari Arkko, 04:00
- Re: Is the datatracker authoritative (was: WG Review: Dynamic Host Configuration (dhc)), Andrew Sullivan, 00:37
August 30, 2013
- Is the datatracker authoritative (was: WG Review: Dynamic Host Configuration (dhc)), S Moonesamy, 23:12
- Re: WG Review: Dynamic Host Configuration (dhc), Ted Lemon, 22:00
- Re: [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08, Andrew Sullivan, 21:51
- Re: WG Review: Dynamic Host Configuration (dhc), S Moonesamy, 20:19
- Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08, S Moonesamy, 19:54
- Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08, Andrew Sullivan, 18:39
- Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08, Douglas Otis, 18:24
- Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08, Tony Hansen, 17:27
- Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08, Hector Santos, 15:46
- Re: Mail lost yesterday, Yoav Nir, 15:39
- Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08, Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:18
- Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08, Andrew Sullivan, 15:10
- Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt), Patrik Fältström, 14:47
- Re: Mail lost yesterday, Brian E Carpenter, 14:44
- Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08, Hector Santos, 14:39
- Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt), John C Klensin, 14:36
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Hector Santos, 14:22
- Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08, Andrew Sullivan, 14:21
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 13:53
- Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08, Hector Santos, 13:38
- Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt), Michelle Cotton, 12:22
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Bob Braden, 12:21
- Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt), John C Klensin, 11:14
- Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:48
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dan Schlitt, 10:05
- AppsDir review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08, Tony Hansen, 09:49
- Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt), Cyrus Daboo, 09:39
- Re: Mail lost yesterday, SM, 09:28
- Re: An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:17
- An IANA Registry for DNS TXT RDATA (I-D Action: draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry-00.txt), John C Klensin, 08:36
- Re: Mail lost yesterday, Mary Barnes, 08:17
- Re: Mail lost yesterday, Jari Arkko, 03:05
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10, Peter Yee, 01:21
August 29, 2013
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Mail lost yesterday, SM, 20:31
- Mailman service interruption yesterday, Glen, 20:17
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 18:43
- Re: Mail lost yesterday, Bob Hinden, 18:29
- Mail lost yesterday, SM, 17:56
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 15:12
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 14:29
- LC comments on draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt, Eric Rosen, 14:25
- Re: External link to article on trends in anti-surveillance design, Scott Brim, 13:39
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:37
- RE: Gen-ART LC review ofdraft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12, Roni Even, 13:18
- Re: External link to article on trends in anti-surveillance design, Ted Lemon, 12:51
- Re: Last Call: <draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt> (Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points) to Best Current Practice, John C Klensin, 12:48
- Re: External link to article on trends in anti-surveillance design, Peter Saint-Andre, 12:22
- External link to article on trends in anti-surveillance design, Dean Willis, 12:17
- Re: Last Call: <draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt> (Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points) to Best Current Practice, SM, 12:13
- Re: Last Call: <draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt> (Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points) to Best Current Practice, Barry Leiba, 11:43
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 11:32
- RE: "Deprecate", Dearlove, Christopher (UK), 11:17
- Re: Last Call: <draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt> (Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points) to Best Current Practice, SM, 11:12
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, SM, 11:11
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10.txt> (A Media Type for Reputation Interchange) to Proposed Standard, SM, 11:10
- Re: "Deprecate", t.p., 10:37
- Re: Gen-ART LC review ofdraft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12, t.p., 10:35
- RE: "Deprecate", Adrian Farrel, 10:16
- Re: "Deprecate", Michelle Cotton, 09:54
- Re: Last Call: <draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt> (Early IANA Allocation ofStandards Track Code Points) to Best Current Practice, t.p., 09:43
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12, Roni Even, 07:52
- RE: "Deprecate", Dearlove, Christopher (UK), 07:24
- RE: "Deprecate", Adrian Farrel, 07:23
- "Deprecate", t.p., 06:58
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12, Loa Andersson, 06:47
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12, Roni Even, 05:27
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12, Mach Chen, 05:06
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-05, Jari Arkko, 04:59
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12, Roni Even, 04:24
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12, Mach Chen, 03:33
August 28, 2013
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12, Roni Even, 10:26
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews, 09:53
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 09:40
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 09:22
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12, Loa Andersson, 09:21
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 08:48
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12, Roni Even, 08:10
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 07:29
- Re: charging remote participants, Simon Pietro Romano, 04:59
August 27, 2013
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 20:13
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), S Moonesamy, 19:29
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 17:54
- Re: I-D Action: draft-sweet-uri-zoneid-00.txt, Bob Hinden, 15:59
- Re: charging remote participants, Bernard Aboba, 15:51
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Pete Resnick, 15:43
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick, 15:34
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-11, Jouni Korhonen, 15:27
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Ted Lemon, 14:54
- Re: I-D Action: draft-sweet-uri-zoneid-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 14:49
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), S Moonesamy, 14:36
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), John Leslie, 14:09
- Re: Last call: draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16.txt, Andrew Allen, 13:30
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Ted Lemon, 12:33
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Melinda Shore, 12:32
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 12:30
- Re: Last call: draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16.txt, S Moonesamy, 12:29
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Scott Brim, 12:21
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-11, Ben Campbell, 12:18
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Ted Lemon, 12:12
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-11, Black, David, 11:42
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley, 11:01
- Re: Last call: draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16.txt, Mary Barnes, 09:28
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 07:35
- Re: Rude responses, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 07:34
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC, Abdussalam Baryun, 06:05
- Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Tim Chown, 05:52
- Re: Rude responses, Abdussalam Baryun, 04:50
- Overloaded TXT harmful (was" Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), John C Klensin, 01:22
August 26, 2013
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 21:36
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 18:57
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Douglas Otis, 18:32
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 18:30
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Douglas Otis, 18:28
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 17:48
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Douglas Otis, 17:43
- Fwd: Re: [dnsext] Deprecating SPF, Mark Andrews, 17:26
- Re: Charging remote participants, Arturo Servin, 17:25
- Re: Charging remote participants, Janet P Gunn, 14:09
- Re: Charging remote participants, Janet P Gunn, 13:57
- Re: Charging remote participants, Randy Presuhn, 12:21
- Re: Charging remote participants, Dave Aronson, 11:56
- Re: Charging remote participants, Mikael Abrahamsson, 11:45
- Re: Charging remote participants, Janet P Gunn, 10:57
- Fwd: Fred MacMurray's, Casey Farrell, 10:24
- Re: [IAOC] GST/PST and IETF 88, Ray Pelletier, 10:17
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Jelte Jansen, 10:16
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Jelte Jansen, 09:56
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John R Levine, 09:50
- RE: [Recentattendees] Huawei is the Host for IETF 88 in Vancouver, Joachimpillai, Damascene M, 09:49
- Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF, bmanning, 09:48
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Jelte Jansen, 09:44
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John R Levine, 09:09
- GST/PST and IETF 88, Michael Richardson, 08:48
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Jelte Jansen, 03:52
- RE: Rude responses, l.wood, 02:36
August 25, 2013
- Re: Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan, 09:43
- Re: Charging remote participants, Abdussalam Baryun, 07:40
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt>, Abdussalam Baryun, 06:33
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Abdussalam Baryun, 06:27
- Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 04:08
August 24, 2013
- Re: SPF PTR Support [was SPF isn't going to change], Hector Santos, 20:40
- Re: SPF PTR Support [was SPF isn't going to change], Scott Kitterman, 19:26
- SPF PTR Support [was SPF isn't going to change], Hector Santos, 12:11
- Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF, Scott Kitterman, 11:54
- Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF, Hector Santos, 11:40
- Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF, Hector Santos, 11:27
- Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 07:40
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 05:18
August 23, 2013
- Re: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 18:10
- Re: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses), S Moonesamy, 17:02
- Re: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses), Hector Santos, 15:24
- Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Douglas Otis, 15:08
- Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF, manning bill, 14:48
- Re: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses), Dave Crocker, 14:47
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 14:35
- Re: IETF 88 - Registration Now Open!, Tim Chown, 13:13
- Re: IETF 88 - Registration Now Open!, John Levine, 13:08
- Re: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses), Scott Brim, 13:07
- Re: Fwd: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF, John Levine, 13:04
- Re: IETF 88 - Registration Now Open!, manning bill, 12:51
- Fwd: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF, manning bill, 12:46
- Re: [dnsext] full standards, Deprecating SPF, Hector Santos, 11:59
- Re: [netext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netext-update-notifications-07.txt> (Update Notifications for Proxy Mobile IPv6) to Proposed Standard, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave), 10:06
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-10, Eric McMurry, 10:05
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-trill-directory-framework-07, Black, David, 10:04
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-netext-update-notifications-07.txt> (Update Notifications for Proxy Mobile IPv6) to Proposed Standard, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano, 10:03
- RE: [Recentattendees] IETF 88 - Registration Now Open!, Mishra, Sanjay, 09:50
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John Levine, 09:34
- Huawei to Host IETF 88 in Vancouver!, IETF Administrative Director, 09:00
- Visibility of shepherd writeup, Carsten Bormann, 05:32
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Jelte Jansen, 04:18
- RE: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses), Dave Cridland, 02:38
August 22, 2013
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- RE: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses), l.wood, 22:23
- The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses), Dave Crocker, 22:14
- RE: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), l.wood, 19:57
- Re: [dnsext] Deprecating SPF, Mark Andrews, 16:24
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-10, Ben Campbell, 15:51
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-10, Black, David, 14:51
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Barry Leiba, 14:23
- New IETF Trust Chair, IETF Administrative Director, 14:06
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John Levine, 12:19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:16
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt>, Aaron Yi DING, 11:21
- Re: SPFBIS LAST CALL: SenderID Framework (PRA, SUBMITTER), S Moonesamy, 10:54
- RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC, mohamed.boucadair, 10:17
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC, Erik Kline, 10:16
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch, 10:04
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Pete Resnick, 10:03
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Thomas Narten, 10:02
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Scott Brim, 09:55
- Re: WG Review: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited (stir), Cullen Jennings (fluffy), 09:54
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Olafur Gudmundsson, 09:40
- SPFBIS LAST CALL: SenderID Framework (PRA, SUBMITTER), Hector Santos, 09:30
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Pete Resnick, 09:26
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Jelte Jansen, 03:37
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Måns Nilsson, 03:01
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik, 02:47
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik, 02:45
August 21, 2013
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 23:24
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 23:17
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 22:21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John Leslie, 22:02
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, David Conrad, 19:48
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Hector Santos, 19:33
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews, 18:32
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 18:19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 18:13
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 18:08
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), S Moonesamy, 17:36
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Måns Nilsson, 17:27
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews, 17:26
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Stephen Farrell, 17:26
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Barry Leiba, 17:13
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews, 16:49
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Dave Crocker, 16:41
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 15:53
- Re: Last call of draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19, S Moonesamy, 15:37
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Måns Nilsson, 15:06
- Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Pete Resnick, 14:50
- Re: WG Review: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited (stir), Hannes Tschofenig, 14:36
- Re: WG Review: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited (stir), Hadriel Kaplan, 14:35
- Re: WG Review: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited (stir), Christopher Morrow, 14:25
- Re: WG Review: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited (stir), Christopher Morrow, 14:19
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 14:18
- Re: WG Review: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited (stir), Dave Crocker, 14:08
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick, 13:59
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 13:51
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-07, Pete Resnick, 13:48
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 13:46
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Olafur Gudmundsson, 13:45
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 13:31
- Re: [spfbis] there is no transitiion, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt>, Ted Lemon, 13:24
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 13:14
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Bob Braden, 13:04
- Re: [spfbis] there is no transitiion, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt>, John Levine, 12:45
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 12:33
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 12:32
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Hector Santos, 12:21
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 12:03
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch, 12:02
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 11:56
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Ted Lemon, 11:24
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik, 10:32
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch, 10:17
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch, 10:14
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC, Owen DeLong, 10:06
- Re: WG overview - MILE video, Arturo Servin, 09:28
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 09:17
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Alessandro Vesely, 09:15
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Jelte Jansen, 09:04
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 08:44
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 08:40
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews, 08:33
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-07, Roni Even, 08:30
- WG overview - MILE video, Moriarty, Kathleen, 08:17
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 07:52
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, manning bill, 06:57
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Eliot Lear, 06:34
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 05:43
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Eliot Lear, 05:28
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 05:15
- RE: [CCAMP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-signaling-g709v3-11.txt> (Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Extensions for the evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks Control) to Proposed Standard, Adrian Farrel, 05:13
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Måns Nilsson, 05:01
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 03:15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, SM, 02:56
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik, 02:50
- RE: [CCAMP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-signaling-g709v3-11.txt> (Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Extensions for the evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks Control) to Proposed Standard, Fatai Zhang, 02:42
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, David Conrad, 02:18
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-model-07.txt> (A Model for Reputation Reporting) to Informational RFC, Murray S. Kucherawy, 02:17
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10.txt> (A Media Type for Reputation Interchange) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 02:05
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-08.txt> (A Reputation Response Set for Email Identifiers) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01:58
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01:53
- Re: Last call: draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16.txt, Andrew Allen, 00:53
August 20, 2013
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 23:00
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 21:15
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC, james woodyatt, 18:59
- Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database", Pete Resnick, 16:42
- Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database", Tony Hansen, 16:23
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 16:17
- Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database", Pete Resnick, 16:16
- Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database", SM, 15:53
- Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database", John C Klensin, 15:29
- Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database", Phillip Hallam-Baker, 15:27
- Re: [dnsext] Deprecating SPF, Patrik Fältström, 14:38
- Re: [dnsext] Deprecating SPF, S Moonesamy, 14:34
- Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database", Pete Resnick, 14:05
- Last call of draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19, Patrik Fältström, 14:02
- RE: [CCAMP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-signaling-g709v3-11.txt> (Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Extensions for the evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks Control) to Proposed Standard, Adrian Farrel, 13:51
- Re: [dnsext] Deprecating SPF, Patrik Fältström, 13:47
- Re: [dnsext] Deprecating SPF, S Moonesamy, 13:39
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 12:33
- Re: [spfbis] SPF TYPE support, S Moonesamy, 12:32
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 11:09
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 10:55
- Re: [spfbis] prefixed names, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt>, Dave Crocker, 10:48
- Re: [spfbis] prefixed names, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt>, Mark Andrews, 10:13
- RE: [Dime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-realm-based-redirect-11.txt> (Realm-Based Redirection In Diameter) to Proposed Standard, lionel.morand, 10:11
- RE: [Dime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-realm-based-redirect-11.txt> (Realm-Based Redirection In Diameter) to Proposed Standard, lionel.morand, 10:10
- RE: [Dime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-realm-based-redirect-11.txt> (Realm-Based Redirection In Diameter) to Proposed Standard, lionel.morand, 10:09
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC, Lorenzo Colitti, 10:08
- RE: Protocol Action: 'RADIUS Option for DHCPv6 Relay Agent' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-radius-opt-14.txt), ATEC, 10:06
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dotzero, 10:05
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch, 10:03
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 09:48
- Re: [spfbis] prefixed names, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt>, John Levine, 09:46
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Hector Santos, 09:21
- Re: [spfbis] SPF TYPE support, Hector Santos, 08:35
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik, 07:36
- Re: [Dime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-realm-based-redirect-11.txt> (Realm-Based Redirection In Diameter) to Proposed Standard, Stefan Winter, 06:38
- Re: Academic and open source rate, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 03:50
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 02:43
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 02:15
- Re: [Dime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-realm-based-redirect-11.txt> (Realm-Based Redirection In Diameter) to Proposed Standard, Stefan Winter, 01:38
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Patrik Fältström, 01:35
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, David Conrad, 00:28
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 00:23
- Re: SPF TYPE support, Dave Crocker, 00:17
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Randy Bush, 00:14
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 00:14
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 00:08
August 19, 2013
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, David Conrad, 23:58
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews, 22:19
- Re: SPF TYPE support, Måns Nilsson, 22:02
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Måns Nilsson, 21:49
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 21:22
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews, 20:28
- Re: [spfbis] SPF TYPE support, Ted Lemon, 19:17
- Re: SPF TYPE support, S Moonesamy, 18:49
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John Levine, 17:59
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 17:40
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Scott Kitterman, 17:26
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), John C Klensin, 17:09
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, David Conrad, 16:55
- Re: SPF TYPE support, Pete Resnick, 16:49
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 16:48
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 16:42
- SPF TYPE support, Hector Santos, 16:15
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 16:07
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 16:04
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 16:01
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick, 15:56
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick, 15:49
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, HLS, 15:44
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John Levine, 15:43
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), SM, 15:11
- Re: Academic and open source rate, SM, 15:10
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 15:08
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John R Levine, 15:00
- Re: Anyone having trouble submitting I-Ds?, Robert Sparks, 14:30
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman, 14:11
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Måns Nilsson, 14:06
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John Levine, 11:13
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Måns Nilsson, 10:05
- Re: Academic and open source rate, Arturo Servin, 09:35
- Re: [rfc-i] [IAOC] Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Nico Williams, 09:31
- Re: [karp] IANA policy for draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Carter Bullard, 09:30
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Vinayak Hegde, 09:10
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Scott Kitterman, 08:42
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Hadriel Kaplan, 08:35
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 08:29
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), John C Klensin, 08:11
- RE: [karp] IANA policy for draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Black, David, 08:09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Carsten Bormann, 05:39
- RE: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Larry Masinter, 05:18
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Tony Finch, 04:09
- Re: [Dime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-realm-based-redirect-11.txt> (Realm-Based Redirection In Diameter) to Proposed Standard, Stefan Winter, 03:17
August 18, 2013
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), SM, 19:06
- Re: Anyone having trouble submitting I-Ds?, John Levine, 16:04
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), John Levine, 16:04
- Re: Anyone having trouble submitting I-Ds?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:27
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:25
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Hadriel Kaplan, 10:51
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), John C Klensin, 09:01
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Hadriel Kaplan, 07:34
- Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Vinayak Hegde, 04:49
- Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), SM, 04:27
- Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Bert Wijnen (IETF), 02:23
August 17, 2013
- Re: [IAOC] Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Russ Housley, 13:23
- Re: [IAB] Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Eliot Lear, 11:28
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-10, Black, David, 10:24
- Re: Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan, 09:22
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Carsten Bormann, 08:02
- Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 07:10
- Re: Charging remote participants, Stephen Farrell, 06:06
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Yaron Sheffer, 05:59
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Yaron Sheffer, 03:20
August 16, 2013
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman, 20:48
- Re: Charging remote participants, Henning Schulzrinne, 20:44
- IAOC Chair, The IAOC, 20:29
- Re: Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan, 19:17
- Re: Anyone having trouble submitting I-Ds?, Benjamin Kaduk, 18:28
- Re: Charging remote participants, Scott Kitterman, 17:44
- Re: Charging remote participants, John C Klensin, 17:39
- Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, David Harrington, 17:34
- Re: Charging remote participants, Mark Baugher (mbaugher), 16:59
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Joe Hildebrand, 16:59
- RE: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Adrian Farrel, 16:48
- Anyone having trouble submitting I-Ds?, Benjamin Kaduk, 16:35
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-karp-ops-model-07, Ben Campbell, 16:14
- Re: Charging remote participants, Henning Schulzrinne, 15:42
- Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Stephen Farrell, 15:30
- Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Sandy Ginoza, 15:18
- Re: Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan, 14:47
- Re: Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan, 14:31
- Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database", Brian E Carpenter, 14:18
- Re: Charging remote participants, Keith Moore, 14:11
- Re: Charging remote participants, Melinda Shore, 13:59
- Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Ray Pelletier, 13:48
- Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database", John C Klensin, 13:45
- Re: Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan, 13:33
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch, 13:08
- Re: [karp] IANA policy for draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Sam Hartman, 13:02
- Re: [karp] IANA policy for draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Sam Hartman, 13:01
- Re: [IAB] Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database", Russ Housley, 12:56
- Re: Charging remote participants, John C Klensin, 12:55
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch, 12:54
- Re: Charging remote participants, Janet P Gunn, 12:52
- RE: [karp] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Black, David, 12:50
- Re: Charging remote participants, David Morris, 12:09
- RE: [karp] IANA policy for draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Black, David, 12:01
- Re: Charging remote participants, Carlos M. Martinez, 11:07
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Andy Bierman, 10:57
- Re: Charging remote participants, Dave Crocker, 10:56
- Re: Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan, 10:37
- Re: Charging remote participants, Arturo Servin, 10:26
- Re: Charging remote participants, Turchanyi Geza, 10:13
- RE: [karp] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Uma Chunduri, 10:03
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Graham Klyne, 10:02
- Re: Charging remote participants, Keith Moore, 09:57
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Keith Moore, 09:56
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 09:55
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Janet P Gunn, 09:04
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Janet P Gunn, 08:51
- Re: Charging remote participants, Janet P Gunn, 08:38
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan, 08:28
- Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan, 08:11
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Arturo Servin, 07:31
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan, 07:08
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, John C Klensin, 06:26
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Joel M. Halpern, 03:59
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Yaron Sheffer, 02:12
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik, 00:39
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik, 00:20
August 15, 2013
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Mark Nottingham, 20:48
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Wesley Eddy, 20:24
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Yaron Sheffer, 17:12
- Re: CBOR and a tag for "critical", Phillip Hallam-Baker, 15:49
- Re: CBOR and a tag for "critical", Yaron Sheffer, 15:44
- Re: CBOR and a tag for "critical", Paul Hoffman, 15:36
- Re: CBOR and a tag for "critical", Yaron Sheffer, 15:19
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch, 15:18
- Re: [karp] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Stephen Kent, 15:05
- CBOR and a tag for "critical", Paul Hoffman, 14:57
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Yaron Sheffer, 14:26
- Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database", SM, 14:15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-model-07.txt> (A Model for Reputation Reporting) to Informational RFC, SM, 13:25
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10.txt> (A Media Type for Reputation Interchange) to Proposed Standard, SM, 12:43
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-08.txt> (A Reputation Response Set for Email Identifiers) to Proposed Standard, SM, 12:43
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, SM, 12:42
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Graham Klyne, 10:20
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Graham Klyne, 10:19
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Harald Alvestrand, 09:25
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Peter Saint-Andre, 09:21
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Harald Alvestrand, 09:11
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Hadriel Kaplan, 09:02
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Hadriel Kaplan, 08:17
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Harald Alvestrand, 05:05
- Re: [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 02:42
August 14, 2013
- Re: [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04, Carsten Bormann, 15:47
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 15:15
- Re: [karp] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Sam Hartman, 14:32
- Re: [karp] IANA policy for draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Sam Hartman, 14:20
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Harald Alvestrand, 13:52
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Harald Alvestrand, 13:51
- Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database", IAB Chair, 13:51
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Andy Bierman, 12:57
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Yaron Sheffer, 10:45
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 10:25
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Andy Bierman, 10:18
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Carsten Bormann, 08:08
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Randy Bush, 06:40
- Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFCPublisher, t.p., 03:17
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Yaron Sheffer, 02:31
- cbor-05 (was: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard), Carsten Bormann, 02:13
August 13, 2013
- re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Randy Presuhn, 20:54
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman, 18:13
- RE: RFC 6980 on Security Implications of IPv6 Fragmentation with IPv6 Neighbor Discovery, Stephen Nadas, 17:28
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Joe Hildebrand, 17:21
- re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Yaron Sheffer, 16:14
- Re: What RFC 2026 says, Dave Crocker, 15:35
- What RFC 2026 says (was: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt), SM, 15:14
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy, 14:09
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Jari Arkko, 14:07
- Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, John Levine, 11:23
- Re: [rfc-i] Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Ray Pelletier, 11:06
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, John C Klensin, 10:37
- Re: [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04, Paul Hoffman, 10:13
- Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Ted Lemon, 10:04
- Last Call: <draft-petithuguenin-behave-turn-uris-05.txt> (Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform Resource Identifiers) to Proposed, Graham Klyne, 10:03
- Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Graham Klyne, 10:02
- Re: [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04, Carsten Bormann, 09:30
- Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Riccardo Bernardini, 09:13
- Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, John Levine, 08:58
- Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Ted Lemon, 08:54
- Re: Data collection for remote participation, S Moonesamy, 07:09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-sec-04.txt> (Security Services for the Registration Data Access Protocol) to Proposed Standard, SM, 07:07
- Re: [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04, Tony Finch, 06:16
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, John Leslie, 05:25
- Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Melinda Shore, 02:50
- Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Dave Cridland, 02:40
- Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Riccardo Bernardini, 02:36
August 12, 2013
- Radical Solution for remote participants, Douglas Otis, 20:00
- Re: Data collection for remote participation, Alejandro Acosta, 18:44
- Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, IETF Administrative Director, 16:56
- Re: Data collection for remote participation, John Leslie, 15:06
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan, 12:56
- NOMS 2014 Call for Papers, Thomas Nadeau, 12:28
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-trill-directory-framework-06, Jari Arkko, 12:20
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan, 11:57
- Re: Data collection for remote participation, Vinayak Hegde, 11:38
- Re: Data collection for remote participation, Janet P Gunn, 11:34
- Re: Data collection for remote participation, Vinayak Hegde, 11:08
- Re: Data collection for remote participation, Janet P Gunn, 11:01
- Re: Data collection for remote participation, Alejandro Acosta, 10:58
- Data collection for remote participation, Vinayak Hegde, 08:19
August 10, 2013
- Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-05, Peter Yee, 23:57
- RE: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Larry Masinter, 17:46
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Hadriel Kaplan, 15:57
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Yoav Nir, 15:54
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 15:01
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:53
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik, 14:41
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Wesley Eddy, 14:36
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Eliot Lear, 13:53
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Yoav Nir, 13:20
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Ted Lemon, 11:49
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Ted Lemon, 11:32
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 10:41
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Hadriel Kaplan, 10:38
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Ted Lemon, 10:22
- Re: Faraday cages..., Ted Lemon, 10:20
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 10:09
- Re: Faraday cages..., Scott Kitterman, 09:59
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Ted Lemon, 09:29
- Re: Faraday cages..., Keith Moore, 08:56
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Hadriel Kaplan, 07:40
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Stephen Farrell, 06:18
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Carsten Bormann, 02:14
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Yaron Sheffer, 01:52
- TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik, 00:48
August 09, 2013
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 21:41
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Stephen Farrell, 20:16
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Ted Lemon, 20:12
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Carsten Bormann, 19:48
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 16:18
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 16:04
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Tim Bray, 15:53
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Martin Thomson, 15:32
- Re: [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 15:30
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo, 14:36
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Barry Leiba, 13:58
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, John C Klensin, 13:37
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Black, David, 10:20
- Gen-ART review of draft-eastlake-rfc5342bis-04, Black, David, 10:13
- Re: Faraday cages..., Ted Lemon, 08:40
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 00:20
August 08, 2013
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Faraday cages..., Mark Andrews, 20:20
- Re: Faraday cages..., George Michaelson, 20:10
- Re: Faraday cages..., Keith Moore, 20:06
- Re: Faraday cages..., George Michaelson, 20:03
- Re: Faraday cages..., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 19:50
- Re: Faraday cages..., George Michaelson, 19:32
- Re: Faraday cages..., Keith Moore, 19:23
- Re: Faraday cages..., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 18:42
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, John Levine, 18:22
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Doug Barton, 17:34
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Yoav Nir, 17:02
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Paul Hoffman, 16:51
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, John Levine, 16:31
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Jorge Contreras, 16:22
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Paul Hoffman, 16:17
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Doug Barton, 16:09
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Paul Hoffman, 16:04
- RE: Faraday cages..., Christian Huitema, 15:54
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Brian E Carpenter, 15:47
- Re: [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04, Carsten Bormann, 14:59
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Chris Griffiths, 14:47
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:40
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Michael Richardson, 14:24
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:53
- Re: Faraday cages..., Ted Lemon, 13:44
- Re: Faraday cages..., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 12:48
- Models of building platform standards, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 11:13
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Dave Crocker, 10:44
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oob-pubkey-09.txt> (Out-of-Band Public Key Validation for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, Alexey Melnikov, 10:27
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Scott Brim, 09:54
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:47
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, John C Klensin, 09:44
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Andrew Feren, 07:44
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, t.p., 04:44
August 07, 2013
- RE: Faraday cages..., John R Levine, 21:29
- Re: Speaking of VAT, Ray Pelletier, 21:10
- Re: Faraday cages..., Henning Schulzrinne, 20:42
- Re: Faraday cages..., Henning Schulzrinne, 20:40
- RE: Faraday cages..., Christian Huitema, 19:18
- Re: Faraday cages..., Ted Lemon, 15:56
- Re: Speaking of VAT, Carsten Bormann, 15:54
- Re: Faraday cages..., Ole Jacobsen, 15:31
- Re: Faraday cages..., Christopher Morrow, 15:27
- Re: Speaking of VAT, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo, 15:14
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo, 15:07
- Re: Faraday cages..., Scott Brim, 13:13
- Re: Faraday cages..., Scott Kitterman, 13:03
- Re: Faraday cages..., Joe Abley, 12:43
- Re: Faraday cages..., Ted Lemon, 12:29
- Re: Faraday cages..., Scott Brim, 12:27
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, manning bill, 12:11
- Re: Faraday cages..., Chris Elliott, 11:26
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Hadriel Kaplan, 10:19
- Faraday cages..., Ted Lemon, 10:16
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Noel Chiappa, 10:14
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Ted Lemon, 10:11
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Paul Aitken, 10:04
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Paul Aitken, 10:03
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Ted Lemon, 09:53
- Re: RPS Accessibility, Ted Lemon, 09:52
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 03:28
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Carsten Bormann, 03:25
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Barry Leiba, 03:04
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Keith Moore, 01:39
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Riccardo Bernardini, 01:26
August 06, 2013
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, John Levine, 23:33
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Randy Bush, 23:23
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, John Levine, 20:02
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Henning Schulzrinne, 19:42
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Douglas Otis, 18:59
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Keith Moore, 18:48
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, John C Klensin, 18:37
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Andy Bierman, 18:29
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Martin Rex, 17:53
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Hadriel Kaplan, 17:16
- RE: RPS Accessibility, Robin Uyeshiro, 16:46
- Microphone protocol, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 16:41
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Martin Rex, 16:36
- Re: RPS Accessibility, Doug Barton, 16:16
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Keith Moore, 16:15
- Re: RPS Accessibility, Michael Richardson, 16:04
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Doug Barton, 15:48
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Doug Barton, 15:48
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Ted Lemon, 15:46
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Hadriel Kaplan, 15:37
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Ted Lemon, 15:30
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Ted Lemon, 15:17
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Melinda Shore, 15:04
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Joe Abley, 14:58
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Dave Crocker, 14:58
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Aaron Yi DING, 14:55
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Joe Hildebrand, 14:46
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Joe Abley, 14:38
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Aaron Yi DING, 14:36
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, John Levine, 14:20
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Ted Lemon, 14:15
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Ted Lemon, 14:14
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Carsten Bormann, 14:11
- Re: RPS Accessibility, Brian Rosen, 13:30
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Joe Hildebrand, 13:19
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Joe Abley, 13:13
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Douglas Otis, 13:08
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Joe Abley, 13:05
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Keith Moore, 13:03
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan, 13:01
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Eliot Lear, 12:54
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Joe Abley, 12:42
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 12:34
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Michael Richardson, 12:33
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Michael Richardson, 12:26
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Joe Hildebrand, 10:42
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Dave Crocker, 10:28
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Dan York, 10:16
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Andrew Feren, 10:07
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Aaron Yi DING, 09:26
- Re: Speaking of VAT, John Levine, 09:15
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Aaron Yi DING, 08:50
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Keith Moore, 08:08
- Re: Speaking of VAT, t.p., 04:38
August 05, 2013
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, John Curran, 21:58
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, John C Klensin, 21:53
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Stephen Farrell, 20:07
- Re: [Trustees] The Trust Agreement, Brian E Carpenter, 15:29
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, James Polk, 13:37
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, John C Klensin, 12:39
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-sec-04.txt> (Security Services for the Registration Data Access Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:37
- Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), John C Klensin, 11:02
- Re: [Trustees] The Trust Agreement, Noel Chiappa, 10:11
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Chris Griffiths, 09:51
- Re: [Trustees] The Trust Agreement, Paul Hoffman, 09:48
- Re: [Trustees] The Trust Agreement, John C Klensin, 09:29
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Michael Richardson, 09:19
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Tobias Gondrom, 08:21
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Paul Hoffman, 08:10
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Hadriel Kaplan, 07:38
- Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-allen-dispatch-imei-urn-as-instanceid-10, Roni Even, 07:37
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Scott Brim, 07:13
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan, 07:11
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Abdussalam Baryun, 07:03
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Scott Brim, 06:56
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Yoav Nir, 06:52
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Scott Brim, 06:44
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan, 06:32
- Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation, Spencer Dawkins at IETF, 06:31
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Olaf Kolkman, 06:10
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Aaron Yi DING, 05:15
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Scott Brim, 04:42
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, SM, 04:36
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Stephen Farrell, 04:31
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Dave Cridland, 04:10
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Peter Saint-Andre, 03:38
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Randy Bush, 02:05
August 04, 2013
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Spencer Dawkins, 21:36
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan, 20:37
- Re: Speaking of VAT, Ray Pelletier, 18:52
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Spencer Dawkins, 18:11
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Aaron Yi DING, 17:57
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan, 17:42
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Melinda Shore, 17:38
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Stephen Farrell, 17:22
- Re: Speaking of VAT, John R Levine, 16:48
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Jari Arkko, 16:44
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan, 16:28
- Re: Speaking of VAT, Yoav Nir, 16:17
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), John C Klensin, 15:56
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Scott Brim, 15:26
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Brian E Carpenter, 15:21
- Speaking of VAT, John Levine, 15:11
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan, 15:11
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Tim Chown, 15:09
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Aaron Yi DING, 15:03
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Melinda Shore, 15:02
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), John Levine, 14:54
- Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Ted Lemon, 14:31
- Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Yoav Nir, 14:06
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Ted Lemon, 13:55
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, John C Klensin, 13:20
- Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Ted Lemon, 13:09
- The Friday Report, S Moonesamy, 12:47
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Michael Richardson, 06:29
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Loa Andersson, 04:08
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Roger Jørgensen, 03:31
- RE: 6tsch BoF, l.wood, 00:34
August 03, 2013
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Barry Leiba, 23:55
- Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Yoav Nir, 21:24
- Re: [Trustees] The Trust Agreement, Brian E Carpenter, 21:11
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Scott Brim, 19:28
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, John C Klensin, 18:26
- RE: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), l.wood, 17:27
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Ulrich Herberg, 17:06
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, John Levine, 16:35
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Barry Leiba, 16:26
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Barry Leiba, 16:24
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, John Levine, 16:21
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, John Levine, 16:20
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Ted Lemon, 15:14
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Ofer Inbar, 12:27
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Scott Brim, 12:03
- Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Scott Brim, 12:00
- Re: 6tsch BoF, SM, 11:44
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, heasley, 10:57
- AW: Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich), 09:37
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Ted Lemon, 07:49
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Ted Lemon, 07:49
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Ted Lemon, 07:48
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, John C Klensin, 07:32
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Barry Leiba, 07:17
- RE: [Trustees] The Trust Agreement, Adrian Farrel, 06:58
- Re: [Trustees] The Trust Agreement, Jorge Contreras, 06:51
- Re: RPS Accessibility, spromano, 05:41
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Greg Shepherd, 05:39
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Ulrich Herberg, 05:34
- RPS Accessibility, Paul Aitken, 05:22
- Re: [Trustees] The Trust Agreement, Chris Griffiths, 05:21
- Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation, Olle E. Johansson, 05:20
- Re: [Trustees] The Trust Agreement, Chris Griffiths, 05:20
- Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Olle E. Johansson, 05:19
- Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Chris Griffiths, 05:18
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Randall Gellens, 05:18
- Re: [Trustees] The Trust Agreement, SM, 05:17
- Re: [IETF] RE: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Warren Kumari, 05:07
- RE: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Adrian Farrel, 04:48
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Ole Jacobsen (ole), 04:14
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Andy Bierman, 03:05
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Heasley, 02:12
- The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Abdussalam Baryun, 02:05
- Re: [Trustees] The Trust Agreement, Chris Griffiths, 01:57
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Patrik Fältström, 01:52
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Abdussalam Baryun, 01:46
- Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Abdussalam Baryun, 01:41
August 02, 2013
- Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Lou Berger, 18:36
- Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Brian E Carpenter, 15:54
- Re: The Trust Agreement, SM, 15:01
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Arturo Servin, 11:41
- Re: Time between meetings, Ulrich Herberg, 10:29
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Keith Moore, 10:27
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Keith Moore, 10:25
- Re: stability of iana.org URLs, Michael Richardson, 08:45
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Janet P Gunn, 08:40
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Michael Richardson, 08:31
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Scott Brim, 08:14
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Roberto Peon, 08:04
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Ted Lemon, 08:00
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Mary Barnes, 07:57
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Roberto Peon, 07:56
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Mary Barnes, 07:55
- RE: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Adrian Farrel, 07:51
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Ole Jacobsen, 07:40
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Jari Arkko, 07:38
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Mary Barnes, 07:34
- Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Scott Brim, 07:15
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Andrew Allen, 07:10
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal), 07:06
- Thanks, and tools work clarification, Henrik Levkowetz, 07:01
- Re: IETF-Blog comments (Was Re: setting a goal for an inclusive IETF), Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 07:00
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Eggert, Lars, 06:59
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal), 06:58
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Scott Brim, 06:51
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Livingood, Jason, 06:50
- Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Adam Roach, 06:35
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Yoav Nir, 06:29
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Pat Thaler, 06:26
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Ted Lemon, 06:22
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Martin Thomson, 06:20
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, joel jaeggli, 06:19
- Re: IETF-Blog comments (Was Re: setting a goal for an inclusive IETF), Rich Kulawiec, 06:18
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Henning Schulzrinne, 06:14
- Re: stability of iana.org URLs, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata), 06:13
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Eggert, Lars, 06:12
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Russ Housley, 06:10
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Yoav Nir, 06:09
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Carsten Bormann, 06:08
- Re: stability of iana.org URLs, Tony Hansen, 06:03
- Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Eggert, Lars, 05:58
- PS Characterization Clarified, Olaf Kolkman, 05:37
- Re: Time between meetings, Arturo Servin, 05:26
- Time between meetings, Ulrich Herberg, 03:33
- Re: Bringing back Internet transparency, joel jaeggli, 02:26
- Re: About Final Receipt, Alexa Morris, 02:18
- Re: 6tsch BoF, SM, 02:15
- About Final Receipt, 赵钦, 02:09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Manger, James H, 02:09
- [IANA #700324] stability of iana.org URLs, Amanda Baber via RT, 02:07
- Re: 6tsch BoF, joel jaeggli, 01:56
- Re: Bringing back Internet transparency, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 01:50
- Re: Bringing back Internet transparency, Keith Moore, 01:29
August 01, 2013
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Manger, James H, 23:49
- Re: The Trust Agreement, John C Klensin, 21:38
- Re: Bringing back Internet transparency, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 20:37
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Melinda Shore, 20:34
- Re: Bringing back Internet transparency, Mark Andrews, 20:24
- The Trust Agreement, Brian E Carpenter, 19:19
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Brian E Carpenter, 19:18
- Re: Bringing back Internet transparency, Noel Chiappa, 19:13
- Re: stability of iana.org URLs, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 19:11
- Protecting the disclosure of the identity (was: Loud humming is subject to cultural bias), SM, 19:10
- Re: Bringing back Internet transparency, Noel Chiappa, 19:08
- Re: stability of iana.org URLs, ned+ietf, 19:07
- Re: Bringing back Internet transparency, Joe Touch, 19:03
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Melinda Shore, 18:56
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Barry Leiba, 18:53
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Dave Crocker, 18:45
- Re: Bringing back Internet transparency, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 18:42
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Ted Lemon, 18:38
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Ralph Droms, 18:34
- Re: stability of iana.org URLs, Peter Saint-Andre, 09:51
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Andy Bierman, 09:50
- Re: stability of iana.org URLs, John Curran, 07:05
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Scott Brim, 06:39
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Yoav Nir, 06:25
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Andy Bierman, 06:17
- Re: 6tsch BoF, SM, 05:31
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Joe Abley, 05:21
- Re: 6tsch BoF, manning bill, 05:07
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Andy Bierman, 04:51
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Ralph Droms, 04:36
- Re: 6tsch BoF, joel jaeggli, 04:32
- Re: Bringing back Internet transparency, Simon Leinen, 04:24
- Re: 6tsch BoF, Andy Bierman, 04:21
- ADMIN PLENARY session recording available, Meetecho Team, 04:15
- TECH PLENARY session recording available, Meetecho Team, 04:09
- 6tsch BoF, Ralph Droms, 03:51
- Re: stability of iana.org URLs, Amanda Baber, 03:11
- Re: making our meetings more worth the time/expense, Dave Crocker, 00:51