I was asked to review the 08 version but my comments from 07 were not
addressed and I did not see any response. So I am resending my previous
review
As for making it a standard track document, I am not sure since it looks to
me as an overview and not standard. And there is no normative language in
the document.
Roni Even
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-repute-model-07
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date:2013-8-20
IETF LC End Date: 2013-8-29
IESG Telechat date:
Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.
Major issues:
Minor issues:
I was wondering why the "Further Discussion" section 9.3 is part of the
security section. I think it should be a separate section.
Nits/editorial comments:
Section 3 the end of 2nd paragraph "mechansisms" to "mechanisms"