Academic might work. "Open source" not so much as other mentioned. Does
"Big Corporation" doing Open Source apply?
I was tempted to propose "non-profit", but also there are organizations
with large budgets. And profit driven ones with not much money.
/as
On 8/18/13 6:21 AM, SM wrote:
Hi Hadriel,
At 12:31 16-08-2013, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
I may be misunderstanding you, but I'm proposing we charge "large
corporations with large travel budgets" slightly *more* than
others.[1] I'm not suggesting an overhaul of the system. I'm not
proposing they get more attention, or more weight, or any such thing.
That sounds like the ability to pay. It might be worth considering
changing the student rate to an academic and open source rate and
doubling the rate. I am not getting into a definition of "academic" or
"open source" [1]. It is left to the organization to determine whether
it is a good idea to be honest or try the weasel words [2] approach.
Regards,
-sm
1. If the IETF is serious about running code (see RFC 6982) it would try
to encourage open source developers to participate more effectively in
the IETF.
2. weasel words give the impression of taking a firm position while
avoiding commitment to any specific claim.