Re: 6tsch BoF

On Aug 3, 2013, at 6:34 PM, SM <sm(_at_)resistor(_dot_)net> wrote:

That one sentence covers all the points which are relevant.  It's an Area 
Director decision.  It does not require consensus or any kind of number game.


The working group charter explicitly requires IETF consensus.   But if you mean 
getting the charter out of the BoF, I think you are right.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: 6tsch BoF, (continued) Re: 6tsch BoF, Andy Bierman Re: 6tsch BoF, Barry Leiba Re: 6tsch BoF, Yoav Nir Re: 6tsch BoF, Scott Brim Re: 6tsch BoF, Andy Bierman Re: 6tsch BoF, Ralph Droms Re: 6tsch BoF, Ted Lemon Message not available Re: 6tsch BoF, SM Re: 6tsch BoF, Ted Lemon Message not available Re: 6tsch BoF, SM Re: 6tsch BoF, Ted Lemon <= Re: 6tsch BoF, Barry Leiba Re: 6tsch BoF, Scott Brim Re: 6tsch BoF, Barry Leiba RE: 6tsch BoF, l.wood Re: 6tsch BoF, Randy Bush Message not available Message not available Message not available Message not available Message not available Protecting the disclosure of the identity (was: Loud humming is subject to cultural bias), SM Re: 6tsch BoF, Brian E Carpenter Re: 6tsch BoF, Melinda Shore Re: 6tsch BoF, SM Re: 6tsch BoF, Dave Crocker

Previous by Date:	Re: 6tsch BoF, Ofer Inbar
Next by Date:	Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, John Levine
Previous by Thread:	Re: 6tsch BoF, SM
Next by Thread:	Re: 6tsch BoF, Barry Leiba
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]