ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-08.txt> (A Reputation Response Set for Email Identifiers) to Proposed Standard

2013-08-15 12:43:06
At 07:43 15-08-2013, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Reputation Services WG (repute)
to consider the following document:
- 'A Reputation Response Set for Email Identifiers'
  <draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-08.txt> as Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2013-08-29. Exceptionally, comments 
may be

draft-ietf-repute-model is a down-ref. I suggest referencing the updated SPF specification as that specification is said to fix some issues in RFC 4408.

Why is DKIM and SPF normatively referenced while SMTP is an informative reference?

Section 5 states that the draft "is primarily an IANA action and doesn't describe any protocols or protocol elements". Why is the intended status "Proposed Standard"?

Regards,
-sm
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>