Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?)

ietf

Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?)

2013-08-27 12:32:27

On 8/27/13 9:11 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:

I would expect the sergeant-at-arms to be reining in that sort of
rudeness before reining in the sort of supposed overt rudeness that
we are discussing here.


That suggestion makes me want to say something a little rude.
Managing the discussion is the chair's job, not the sergeant-
at-arms's.

Melinda

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), (continued) Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), JORDI PALET MARTINEZ Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Ted Lemon Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Scott Brim Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Ted Lemon Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), John Leslie Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Ted Lemon Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Pete Resnick Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Phillip Hallam-Baker Message not available Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), S Moonesamy Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Melinda Shore <= Message not available Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), S Moonesamy Re: Rude responses, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ

Previous by Date:	Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy
Next by Date:	Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Ted Lemon
Previous by Thread:	Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), Phillip Hallam-Baker
Next by Thread:	Re: Rude responses (sergeant-at-arms?), S Moonesamy
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]