On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:28 PM, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf(_at_)elandsys(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Hi Phillip,
At 15:53 27-08-2013, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
What I found incredibly rude was when an AD and Working Group chair
actually hissed when I gave my company name at the mic.
I submitted draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-**3184bis During the
discussions (see thread at http://www.ietf.org/mail-**
archive/web/diversity/current/**msg00201.html<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/diversity/current/msg00201.html>)about
the draft it was suggested there should be consequences of not
following the code of conduct. What action would you suggest against:
(i) the Area Director in a case such as the above?
(ii) the Working Group chair in a case such as the above?
In that case they were the same person. Which I think was a major
structural problem in that nobody on the IESG was prepared to stand up to
him.
So I would start off by not allowing that situation to occur in the first
place.
But in general where you have a WG chair that shows blatant bias you have
to get rid of that WG chair.
If DNSSEC had been my product I would have pushed VeriSign to do more than
appeal the Opt-in debacle, I would have litigated.
--
Website: http://hallambaker.com/