On 8/27/13 2:53 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
On Aug 27, 2013, at 3:08 PM, John Leslie<john(_at_)jlc(_dot_)net> wrote:
I feel sorry for Ted, who _does_ have to evaluate consensus here.
Actually no, I don't—spfbis is apps area, not int area. Lucky me... :)
See the message I just posted. Yes, the additional repetitions make it
take longer, but really it's not so hard to say, "Yep, that's already on
my list of issues" and toss the repetitious message aside.
On 8/27/13 12:20 PM, Scott Brim wrote:
On 8/27/13 9:11 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
I would expect the sergeant-at-arms to be reining in that sort of
rudeness before reining in the sort of supposed overt rudeness that
we are discussing here.
IMHO that's not a job for the sergeant at arms. The SAA is responsible
for how things are said. The shepherd -- or supershepherd or whatever
-- would be responsible for the substance.
On 8/27/13 12:31 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:
That suggestion makes me want to say something a little rude.
Managing the discussion is the chair's job, not the sergeant-
at-arms's.
Yeah, again, that's me. Also see my recent message.
That said, I do wish it didn't take intervention on my part. I wish
people would realize they're being repetitive. I wish people would stop
responding to the repetition. (Neither is going to change my opinion of
the consensus.) But then again, I also wish I had a pony.
pr
--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478