On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 02:37:13PM -0400, Hector Santos wrote:
For example, DKIM-REPUTE product designers would need to consider
SPF reputons product models. Simple text as follows can resolve the
integration consideration with little SPF fanfare the draft
obviously tried to avoid:
Why should the framework document contain details of how various
particular reputation services interact? If you want a discussion of
reputation-service-interaction mechanisms in the draft, that's one
thing. If you want to talk about how SPF and DKIM interact, then I
think this is probably the wrong draft.
Best,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs(_at_)anvilwalrusden(_dot_)com