Hi,
I don't care if this report is published or not, but I will point
out that the 1 week sample period is not that useful if
the intent is to spot excessive posting.
Somebody could be following up on 1 thread, and not post again
for a year. Somebody could be participating in an IETF Last Call
discussion, which should not even count as "extra" since that is
a critical part of our review process.
Andy
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Heasley <heas(_at_)shrubbery(_dot_)net> wrote:
Am Aug 3, 2013 um 9:05 schrieb Abdussalam Baryun
<abdussalambaryun(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>:
On 8/3/13, Patrik Fältström <paf(_at_)frobbit(_dot_)se> wrote:
On 3 aug 2013, at 08:46, Abdussalam Baryun
<abdussalambaryun(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
wrote:
I prefer if you post at end of Friday (as in the end of working days of 5
in each week).
However, in my comment below I
will follow the week as done in world calender, start from Sunday
(mornings) and ends on Saturday (nights).
The day a week starts, and what days are working days in a week, differs
between cultures. Many have Sunday-Thursday as working days. Many have
Monday as the first day of the week.
I suggested to Thomas to submit report in end of Friday (read what i
I suggest eliminating the report. As it doesn't measure content quality,
one's contribution can't be measured by the email they produce. So, it is
only a guage of the distraction they produce. The report itself is a
distraction.