Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at

On 8/4/13 11:53 AM, John Levine wrote:

As far as I can tell, one person objects, everyone else thinks it's fine.


More to the point, the objections that are being raised appear
to be bogus and based in a misunderstanding of how the IETF
operates.

Melinda

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Abdussalam Baryun Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Heasley Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Andy Bierman Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Ole Jacobsen (ole) Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Roger Jørgensen Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Loa Andersson Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), John Levine Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Melinda Shore <= Message not available Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Tim Chown Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), John C Klensin Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Jari Arkko Message not available Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Abdussalam Baryun Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Scott Brim Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Hadriel Kaplan Message not available The Friday Report, S Moonesamy

Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org)