On 08/08/2013 02:04 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On Aug 8, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Brian E Carpenter
<brian(_dot_)e(_dot_)carpenter(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
We might reach consensus that it's OK to release change control over
the Tao (although I'm not sure I agree with that - what's so hard about
keeping it under an RFC-like license?).
Nothing is "hard" about it. The question is whether granting a different
license will help the goals of the Tao more than the current license. Many people
(including me, the current editor) think that a lighter-weight license would get the Tao
read by more people.
Can you elaborate on why the license makes a difference?