I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date:2013-8-28
IETF LC End Date: 2013-9-4
IESG Telechat date:
Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a standard track RFC.
Major issues:
Minor issues:
I am not clear on the sub-TLV in section 6.2
1. If a new sub-TLV is defined for TLV type 1 do they need also to be
added to TLV type 21. This should be clear, and if there is some relation I
think it should be reflected in the IANA registry for TLV type 1
2. For the vendor or private use why a difference policy than the rest
of the sub-TLV registry
Nits/editorial comments:
1. In section 3.4 I assume that "TC" is traffic class. It will be good
to expand and have reference.