Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Pete Resnick 
<presnick(_at_)qti(_dot_)qualcomm(_dot_)com>wrote:

Some folks have simply dismissively said, "Go read the archive", without
pointers.



Pete, I like your position, but I believe "go read the archive" or the
equivalent will continue to be a standard response unless someone is
responsible for giving a more thorough response. Who do you think that
should be?

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, (continued) Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Pete Resnick Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Dave Crocker Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Barry Leiba Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Stephen Farrell RE: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), l.wood Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Thomas Narten Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), S Moonesamy Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Pete Resnick Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Scott Brim <= Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Pete Resnick Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), Barry Leiba Visibility of shepherd writeup, Carsten Bormann The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses), Dave Crocker RE: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses), l.wood RE: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses), Dave Cridland Re: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses), Scott Brim Re: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses), Dave Crocker Re: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses), Hector Santos Re: The Last Call social contract (was - Re: Rude responses), S Moonesamy

Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard)