In message
<20130801191438(_dot_)C027718C183(_at_)mercury(_dot_)lcs(_dot_)mit(_dot_)edu>,
Noel Chiappa write
s:
> From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
> The ISPs had a clear interest in killing of NAT which threatened the
> ISP business model.
So this is rather amusing: you're trying to tell me that ISPs wanted to kill
NAT, and I have other people telling me NAT was an intergral part of ISPs'
master plan to take over the universe.
Clearly you all both can't be right.
They want the extra dollars for extra address but the don't want
the support costs that would bring. They sit at different points
for different sets of customers.
Noel
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka(_at_)isc(_dot_)org