On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Ted Lemon
<Ted(_dot_)Lemon(_at_)nominum(_dot_)com> wrote:
On Aug 29, 2013, at 1:22 PM, Peter Saint-Andre
<stpeter(_at_)stpeter(_dot_)im> wrote:
Interesting stuff, but more on-topic for the perpass list:
I think Deans point is precisely that it is _not_ a topic that can be
restricted to the perpass list.
Yes and yes. Every protocol needs privacy considerations, and such
considerations SHOULD be discussed in every WG. But we also need a place
where we can talk about them in general, and that's perpass.
One of the major points a WG should ensure is that a protocol does not
_limit_ the privacy possibilities in the environment it is part of. That's
not easy, but see RFC 6973 for a start.
Scott