Hi Andy,
Please see Carsten's mail on this subject.
Thanks,
Yaron
On 2013-08-14 18:18, Andy Bierman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Yaron Sheffer
<yaronf(_dot_)ietf(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Hi Randy,
I prefer to leave this question to people who know something about Netconf,
i.e. not me.
But let me just say that, based on my thoroughly extensive 5-min. research,
YANG seems to be incompatible with CBOR.
Can you be more specific?
What is incompatible about YANG?
Thanks,
Yaron
Andy
On 2013-08-14 04:53, Randy Presuhn wrote:
Hi -
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf(_dot_)ietf(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
Sent: Aug 13, 2013 2:11 PM
To: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Subject: re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary
Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard
...
- The "diagnostic notation" can be used very effectively for things like
configuration files, e.g. if an application already uses CBOR on the
wire. Therefore I would suggest to formalize it a bit more, so that we
also have interoperability at this level.
Do you envision it as an encoding for Netconf?
Randy