Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at

ietf

Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org)

2013-08-03 12:03:04

On 08/03/13 05:48, Adrian Farrel allegedly wrote:

Have you considered not reading it?


+1.  Especially during IETF week, people on various lists are losing
track of their delete key, or the ability to set mail filter rules.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Adrian Farrel Re: [IETF] RE: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Warren Kumari Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Scott Brim <= Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Aaron Yi DING

Previous by Date:	Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Scott Brim
Next by Date:	Re: 6tsch BoF, Ofer Inbar
Previous by Thread:	Re: [IETF] RE: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Warren Kumari
Next by Thread:	Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org), Aaron Yi DING
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]