Hi Eliot,
At 03:26 21-08-2013, Eliot Lear wrote:
First, I appreciate that you and Dave are bringing data to the
table. However, in this case, it is not in dispute that queries are
happening. What *is* in dispute is whether there are answers. I
must admit I am having a difficult time understanding the logic,
even so. The *hard* part about this was supposed to be
implementation of the record in the application software. Can the
shepherd answer this question:
To what extent has that happened?
There is a thread about libspf2 querying for RRTYPE 99 first (
https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20110812.094310.3a53c0f6.gl.html#exim-users
).
I'll also mention
http://support.godaddy.com/groups/domains-management-and-services/forum/topic/spf-type-99/
and http://features.cpanel.net/responses/ability-to-create-spf-type-99-records
Here are a few messages on the SPFBIS mailing list about RRTYPE 99:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis/current/msg00555.html
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis/current/msg03778.html
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis/current/msg03781.html
The SPFBIS WG Chair asked a question about what to conclude given the
SPFBIS Charter (
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis/current/msg03779.html ).
Regards,
S. Moonesamy (as document shepherd)