At 14:52 27-08-2013, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points'
<draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt> as Best Current Practice
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2013-09-24. Exceptionally, comments
may be
In Section 2:
'a. The code points must be from a space designated as "Specification
Required" (where an RFC will be used as the stable reference),
"RFC Required", "IETF Review", or "Standards Action".'
I suggest not having the comment (where) and leaving it to RFC 5226
to define "Specification Required".
Regards,
-sm