to clarify, imho:
presentation != slides
making the best out of IETF meetings for both f2f and remote
participants is hard and yet worth our try.
back to our slides shipping tread, everybody has own opinion toward
whether "I" prefer/believe the slides should be uploaded earlier or not
so, and obeying our own principle when doing our own presentation
materials is definitely appreciated, but don't force it upon others
please. (of course WG chairs can recommend WG presenters to follow the
same agenda for better coordination within the group, and in that case
f2f and remote participants can be duly notified via WG mailing list, in
advance)
Thanks,
Aaron
On 06/08/13 14:49, Aaron Yi DING wrote:
On 06/08/13 14:08, Keith Moore wrote:
On 08/04/2013 02:54 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
While I think getting slides in on time is great for a lot of
reasons, reading the slides early isn't that important. What is
important is that remote people see the slides at the same time as
local people. For that, it seems to me that Meetecho support does
exactly what is needed. You just follow the slideshow online, along
with the audio.
I agree that remote people should see the slides at the same time as
local people, except that I think that in both cases this should be
well before the meeting. The slides shouldn't be shown at the meeting
unless needed to illustrate a point of active discussion.
People keep acting as if the purpose of these meetings - the reason
people spend thousands of euro and travel thousands of km - is to
watch slides.
interesting.. out of pure curiosity, "People keep acting", you mean,
who?
Thanks,
Aaron
PS: this whole tread is about the key word "slides". If one of the key
purposes is NOT about presentation, what are talking about here? plz
correct me, if I got it wrong...
Keith