On 20 aug 2013, at 20:36, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf(_at_)elandsys(_dot_)com> wrote:
It would be better to have the discussion on the ietf@ mailing list as that's
the venue which the IESG identified for last Call comments.
Understood, and thanks.
The reason why I did not post there at first was that a) I did not feel I had
followed the rules laid out for discussions [read all messages in the mailing
list archives] and b) the discussion on the dnsext list was more general on
overload of TXT records [something DNS people have always been against -- see
IAB document on DNS choices].
But, when having that discussion on the dnsext mailing list, to which I cc:ed
Pete as responsible AD for full disclosure, Pete did ask me for a complete
explanation of my view, which I posted.
Once again, without re-reading the mailing list archives.
Patrik