On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:46 PM, manning bill <bmanning(_at_)isi(_dot_)edu>
wrote:
the question is not that "nobody" checks type 99, the question is
"is the rate of adoption
of type 99 -changing- in relation to type 16?
As John pointed out, support for checking type 99 has decreased and
continues to decrease rather than increase. So waiting longer is not going
to solve the issue.
Putting a statement in an RFC does not mean that the world will
automatically advance towards that particular end state.
Forcing a WG to adopt a position to suit another constituency is not going
to lead them to advocate for that position in deployment constituencies.
Particularly when the original constituency does nothing to advance
deployment.
--
Website: http://hallambaker.com/