On 9/3/2013 6:02 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
On 9/3/13 3:17 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
<rant class="short">So that the reader of RFC 2026 will need to read yet
another document to get the full picture? There are currently 8 RFCs
that
update RFC 2026, some of which have been updated themselves.</rant>
Quite seriously - I appreciate Pete's reluctance to overload the
draft, but
it is a related topic. I'd be inclined to include it.
OK, does this do anything for anyone?
Finally, RFC 2026 [RFC2026] section 6.1.3 also calls for the
publication of an "official summary of standards actions completed
and pending" in the Internet Society's newsletter. This has also not
been done in recent years, and the "publication of record" for
standards actions has for some time been the minutes of the IESG.
[IESG-MINUTES] Therefore, that paragraph is also effectively removed
from section 6.1.3.
That would work for me.
Spencer