It has been pointed out to me that I went overboard in my response to you. I
will state what was obvious to me as I wrote my response, but may not have been
obvious to other readers: I am not the responsible AD for v6ops. My response
was that of a participant in v6ops.
I didn't find what you wrote helpful, but what I like isn't particularly
important in this case, unless you decide it is. I did not intend to suggest
that you should not criticize this document. I would like to see more
substance to the criticism.
But the way I expressed that desire was (a) overly sarcastic and (b) not
constructive, and I apologize for that.