On Sep 11, 2013, at 9:18 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
wrote:
The DNS is the naming infrastructure of the Internet. While it is in theory
possible to use the DNS to advertise very rapid changes to Internet
infrastructure, the practice is that the Internet infrastructure will look
almost exactly the same in one hour's time as it does right now.
Using DNS data from 24 hours earlier might create reliability issues but
should never introduce a security risk. Anyone who is relying on the DNS for
data that is more time sensitive than 1 hour is doing it wrong.
I disagree. DNSSEC is not just DNS: its the only available, deployed, and
(mostly) accessible global PKI currently in existence which also includes a
constrained path of trust which follows already established business
relationships.
Dynamic DNSSEC applications, where signatures are generated on the fly, are
almost certainly going to be developed to utilize this infrastructure.
--
Nicholas Weaver it is a tale, told by an idiot,
nweaver(_at_)icsi(_dot_)berkeley(_dot_)edu full of sound and
fury,
510-666-2903 .signifying nothing
PGP: http://www1.icsi.berkeley.edu/~nweaver/data/nweaver_pub.asc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail