ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC

2013-10-08 14:06:31

On Oct 7, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Ted Hardie <ted(_dot_)ietf(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> 
wrote:

Lastly, I think Pete has failed to capture that one reason for using humming 
or hands is that it is easy for very active participants to dominate a 
conversation
but much less easy for them to pretend to be a large group.  Particularly in 
BoFs, using those methods to indicate the likely breadth of interest is 
critical.  The same method can be used, with some of the caution Pete 
recommends, to gauge whether an issue which appears to be contentious based 
on a mic line is actually a problem.  It can also, in some cases, be a 
valuable method of reinforcing the resolve a room that has already likely 
come to a broad agreement.  That does not contravene Pete's point that this 
should not be used to silence objections, but there are cases where it is 
important in its own right.

In my working group, that is the principal use of a hum. It is useful when a 
set of people have made a viewpoint known, and the chairs are trying to see if 
that represents a general view, or whether a focused minority is speaking. 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>