Re: The RFC xx99 Series

ietf

2013-10-08 14:47:15


On 2013-10-08, at 11:38, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:

Or how about reserving "RFC 3399" for use as an example RFC number...


Do we need a document to document that document for use in documents as 
documentation?


Joe

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: The RFC xx99 Series, Eric Gray Re: The RFC xx99 Series, Donald Eastlake Re: The RFC xx99 Series, Joe Abley <= Re: The RFC xx99 Series, Mark Atwood

Previous by Date:	Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC, Fred Baker (fred)
Next by Date:	Re: [Sdn] FW: Last Call: <draft-sin-sdnrg-sdn-approach-04.txt> (Software-Defined Networking: A Perspective From Within A Service Provider) to Informational RFC, Linda Dunbar
Previous by Thread:	Re: The RFC xx99 Series, Donald Eastlake
Next by Thread:	Re: The RFC xx99 Series, Mark Atwood
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]