seems to me to be completely reasonable to say MUST include the number of the
RFC that describes
the protocol being registered (for example)
Scott
On Oct 29, 2013, at 4:22 PM, Julian Reschke
<julian(_dot_)reschke(_at_)gmx(_dot_)de> wrote:
So,
while getting IETF LC comment for httpbis, one reviewer complains about the
use of RFC2119 in registration procedures, while another one complains about
the lack of them in a different place.
Can we please clarify what's the right approach?
Best regards, Julian
/me thinks RFC2119 do not belong there.
Scott Bradner
Harvard University Information Technology
Innovation & Architecture
+1 617 495 3864
1350 Mass Ave., Room 760
Cambridge, MA 02138
www.harvard.edu/huit