ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RFC2119 keywords in registration requirements

2013-10-29 15:54:28
yup

Scott 

On Oct 29, 2013, at 4:48 PM, Julian Reschke 
<julian(_dot_)reschke(_at_)gmx(_dot_)de> wrote:

On 2013-10-29 21:46, Bradner, Scott wrote:
see rfc 2418 page 3 as well as RFC 2434 page 3 for an example of 
non-protocol uses of 2119 terms

fwiw - I have seen 2119 terms used in registration type RFCs for rather many 
years
I think it is too late to unwind that clock

Scott

Scott Bradner

Well yes, I've seen that too.

But there *is* confusion about whether it's the right approach, and it would 
be really cool if there was some consistency with respect to this.

Best regards, Julian